Michael Richard: Executed by computer crash and a 5 p.m court closing time
Somebody should buy Texas Defender Service some new computers and a
heart for the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.
The New York Times:
The stay for the Texas execution was issued two days after the
court did not stop Texas from executing another inmate, Michael
Richard, leading to some confusion about its intentions.
Lawyers in the case on Tuesday said their appeal had been turned
down because of an unusual series of procedural problems.
Professor Dow said the computers crashed at the Texas Defender
Service in Houston while lawyers were rewriting his appeal to take
advantage of the high court's unexpected interest in lethal
injection.
Because of the resulting delay, the lawyers missed by 20 minutes
the 5 p.m. filing deadline at the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
in Austin, where the appeal had to go first before moving to the
Supreme Court.
The Texas court refused their pleas to remain open for the extra
minutes. Because the lawyers missed that crucial step, Professor
Dow said, the Supreme Court had to turn down the appeal, and Mr.
Richard was executed.
The Austin AMERICAN-STATESMAN:
Why did the U.S. Supreme Court halt the execution of one Texas
inmate Thursday while allowing another prisoner, who presented the
same arguments against lethal injection, to die two days earlier?
Defense lawyers blamed the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which
refused requests to stay open after 5 p.m. Tuesday, stopping a key
appeal from being filed on behalf of Michael Richard. Richard,
convicted of raping and killing a Harris County mother of seven in
1986, was executed later that night.
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE
(enlarge photo)
Michael Richard His appeal wasn't filed to court by 5 p.m.
"It's an inexcusable failure," said Andrea Keilen, executive
director of the Texas Defender Service, which represented Richard.
"To close at 5 when the execution is scheduled for 6 p.m.? We need
to have access to the courts."
Abel Acosta, chief deputy clerk for the court, said it is
longstanding policy for the court to close on time. "The clerk's
office consulted with the court, and we were advised that our hours
are 8 to 5," he said.
Keilen said the extra time was needed to respond to Tuesday
morning's news that the Supreme Court accepted a Kentucky case
challenging lethal injections as cruel and unusual punishment.
Sphere: Related Content
No comments:
Post a Comment