how philosophy is like computer science

How Philosophy Is Like Computer Science

A few days ago Noelle McAfee wrote a post at Gone Public about whether

academic philosophy careers are especially harsh on mothers. Her post

generated valuable extensive discussion about the compatibility of

mothering and philosophy.

Noelle's comparison between philosophy and the sciences set my own

thoughts off on a different track. In the past, there was low

participation by women in both science careers and in philosophy (I'll

post figures on this tomorrow). But in the last two decades, women

have come closer to parity in the sciences, and especially in the life

sciences, where they now earn more than 50% of undergraduate degrees.

Science still has a pipeline problem: the percentage of undergraduate

degrees which go to women is greater than the percentage of graduate

degrees, which is greater than the percentage of postdocs, and so on,

right up to tenured professor.

I think philosophy has the same pipeline problem. But who would know

it, since the figures (especially employment figures) are simply not

kept.

What has made a difference for women in the sciences is that there is

general awareness of the problem of underrepresentation of women and

minorities, and there are focused efforts to address the pipeline

problem. Every single issue of Science, published by the professional

organization AAAS, has a news item or editorial or personal profile

relevant to the problem of disparate gender and race representation.

Computer science is the only science/tech/engineering discipline in

which participation by women has actually been dropping. In 1985, 37%

of bachelor's degrees in computer sciences were awarded to women; ten

years later, in 1995, this had fallen to 29% and has continued to fall

over the last decade, to less than 17% in 2003.

Are there similarities between computer science's gender problems and

philosophy's?

Last week a friend reported to me a conversation he had with an

information sciences professor. That professor gave two reasons for

the lack of women in their program:

1. It is a pipeline problem going back to middle school. The problem

is that CS doesn't have an effective professional organization (he

called them fuddyduds) who go into schools and generate broad interest

in computing and its social effects. (He said that engineering, which

has been raising its participation rates, does have that.)

2. Women just don't know about information sciences programs that

might interest them more than computer programming. There are college

degree programs that deal, for instance, with human-computer

interaction and the social effects of computing. But high school

guidance counselors don't know enough about these IT programs, and

again, the professional organizations have dropped the ball.

Fuddyduds or not, the APA does the barest minimum to address the

problems of women in philosophy. It does not collect data. There is

the fabulous Committee on the Status of Women, but from what I can

tell, the CSW receives little attention from philosophers who aren't

women.

And philosophy, too, is misunderstood ("metaphysics" = spirituality?).

There's no reason to think that high school guidance counselors

particularly understand what a philosophy degree offers, either.